The agency gap in AI-supported writing: How reactive and proactive agent designs shape multimodal reasoning
Publication date: Available online 30 July 2026 Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence Author(s): Yueqiao Jin, Kaixun Yang, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Dragan Gasevic, Lixiang Yan
Record details
Published: 1 August 2026
Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 1 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Integrating AI into Requirements Quality Learning in Software Engineering Education: A TPACK-Guided Empirical Study
arXiv · 30 July 2026
From Scoring to Acting: Outcome-Verified Comparative Self-Distillation for LLM Agents
arXiv · 30 July 2026
A scoping review of generative AI-powered agentic AI in education: Research landscape, agentic capabilities, and insights from the frontier agent paradigm, exemplified by OpenClaw
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 30 July 2026
The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
SKILL-KD: Contrastive Skill Distillation for LLM Agents
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 3 August 2026
Hybrid AI for Explainable and Accurate Conversational Agents in eGovernment
arXiv cs.CY · 4 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 August 2026), “The agency gap in AI-supported writing: How reactive and proactive agent designs shape multimodal reasoning,” evidence record 15398, https://ethics.ai/record/15398 (originally published by Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.