Evidence record 14528 · automatically gathered

The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning

arXiv:2507.04398v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative AI is becoming part of academic writing, but its educational value depends on how control is shared between learner and system. This study examined an agency gap: performance differences that may arise when AI agent initiative is misaligned with learners' generative AI literacy. Seventy-nine medical and nursing students completed two multimodal analytical writing tasks using healthcare simulation data visualisations. They were

Record details

Published: 30 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Healthcare · Children & education · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 30 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (30 July 2026), “The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning,” evidence record 14528, https://ethics.ai/record/14528 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.