Feedback modalities in human-cobot collaboration: experimental evaluation of performance, user experience, and physiological responses
Collaborative robots (cobots) are increasingly deployed in industrial as well as non-industrial domains to support human-centered operation. While physical safety and task efficiency have received considerable attention, less is known about how feedback modality influences operator experience and physiological responses under different collaboration demands. This study examines the effects of feedback modalities in two human–cobot collaboration scenarios representing distinct coordination struct
Record details
Published: 30 July 2026
Source: Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 30 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Cross-Embodiment Transfer via Behavior-Aligned Representations
arXiv cs.LG · 30 July 2026
Safety, or Just Capability? A Validity Audit of Agent-Safety Benchmarks
arXiv red teaming query · 30 July 2026
The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
SARC-DQ: Runtime Data-Quality Gating for Agentic AI: Silent Evidence Defects, the Incompetence Shield, and Downstream-Only Remediation
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 July 2026), “Feedback modalities in human-cobot collaboration: experimental evaluation of performance, user experience, and physiological responses,” evidence record 14635, https://ethics.ai/record/14635 (originally published by Frontiers in Robotics and AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.