Evidence record 14525 · automatically gathered

The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers

arXiv:2604.24155v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The project of aligning machine behavior with human values raises a basic problem: whose moral expectations should guide AI decision-making? Much alignment research assumes that the appropriate benchmark is how humans themselves would act in a given situation. Studies of agent-type value forks challenge this assumption by showing that people do not always judge humans and AI systems identically. This paper extends that challenge by examining tw

Record details

Published: 30 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 30 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (30 July 2026), “The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers,” evidence record 14525, https://ethics.ai/record/14525 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.