Estimating the Geopolitical Preferences of Large Language Models from United Nations Voting Data
arXiv:2607.25526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How should researchers measure the geopolitical preferences expressed by large language models (LLMs)? Existing audits commonly rely on surveys and simple tests, but international-relations research has long recognized that measuring geopolitical preferences is difficult and has developed methods for recovering them from observed choices. This paper applies a dynamic ordinal ideal-point approach from international relations, treating LLMs as respon
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 29 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Artificial Institutions: How Institutional Design Shapes LLM Simulations
arXiv cs.CY · 6 August 2026
Geopolitical alignment: Endorsement effects in large language models
arXiv · 10 July 2026
Fairness Is Not Enough: Auditing Competence and Intersectional Bias in AI-powered Resume Screening
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
Reconfiguring the global factory: The synergistic role of additive manufacturing, explainable AI, and knowledge acquisition in MNC operations
Technology in Society · 29 July 2026
What if I Want to be an Avatar: Moral and Legal Implications of Opting for a Life in the Metaverse
Science and Engineering Ethics · 29 July 2026
Requiem Without an Orchestrator: A Commentary on Hollanek and Nowaczyk-Basińska (2024)
Philosophy & Technology · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “Estimating the Geopolitical Preferences of Large Language Models from United Nations Voting Data,” evidence record 14096, https://ethics.ai/record/14096 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.