Evidence record 14096 · automatically gathered

Estimating the Geopolitical Preferences of Large Language Models from United Nations Voting Data

arXiv:2607.25526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How should researchers measure the geopolitical preferences expressed by large language models (LLMs)? Existing audits commonly rely on surveys and simple tests, but international-relations research has long recognized that measuring geopolitical preferences is difficult and has developed methods for recovering them from observed choices. This paper applies a dynamic ordinal ideal-point approach from international relations, treating LLMs as respon

Record details

Published: 29 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 29 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “Estimating the Geopolitical Preferences of Large Language Models from United Nations Voting Data,” evidence record 14096, https://ethics.ai/record/14096 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.