Geopolitical alignment: Endorsement effects in large language models
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to summarize and evaluate policy-relevant information, but it remains unclear whether their judgments are implicitly shaped by geopolitical cues. I study this question with an endorsement experiment in which four LLMs evaluate the same international economic and security policies after each policy is randomly described as supported by the United States, the European Union, China, or Russia. In the numeric-only condition, GPT-5, Claude Sonnet, an
Record details
Published: 10 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
How Well Do Models Follow Their Constitutions?
arXiv · 22 May 2026
LWiAI Podcast #252 - GPT 5.6, Grok 4.5, Nemotron-Labs-Diffusion, AI 2040
Last Week in AI · 21 July 2026
OpenAI backs narrower Massachusetts AI safety bill
Politico Technology (US) · 21 July 2026
AI Safety Regulations in the U.S. Could Give Hackers an Edge
IEEE Spectrum · 6 August 2026
The Missing Rival: China and the Limits of AI Antitrust
Truth on the Market (digital regulation) · 17 July 2026
US reportedly favors selective bans over blanket restrictions on Chinese open weight models citing security concerns
The Decoder · 26 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (10 July 2026), “Geopolitical alignment: Endorsement effects in large language models,” evidence record 67, https://ethics.ai/record/67 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.