WHBench: Evaluating Frontier LLMs with Expert-in-the-Loop Validation on Women's Health Topics
arXiv:2604.00024v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used for medical guidance, but women's health remains under-evaluated in benchmark design. We present the Women's Health Benchmark (WHBench), a targeted evaluation suite of 47 expert-crafted scenarios across 10 women's health topics, designed to expose clinically meaningful failure modes including outdated guidelines, unsafe omissions, dosing errors, and equity-related blind spots. We evaluate 22 mod
Record details
Published: 27 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare
Retrieved: 27 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Shape-Based Inductive Bias for Glioma Grading from Tumor Contours
arXiv cs.LG · 27 July 2026
Moralizing metrics: Discourses of data and equity in California's public health response to COVID-19
Big Data & Society · 28 July 2026
Fairness Interventions in Classification: A Study on AI Explainability
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
“Antisocial Today and Also Always”?: A Qualitative Examination of Engineering Students’ Social Considerations in Robot Design for Healthcare
Science and Engineering Ethics · 24 July 2026
Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 23 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “WHBench: Evaluating Frontier LLMs with Expert-in-the-Loop Validation on Women's Health Topics,” evidence record 13592, https://ethics.ai/record/13592 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.