Fairness Interventions in Classification: A Study on AI Explainability
arXiv:2407.14766v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper presents a philosophical and experimental study of fairness interventions in AI classification, centered on the explainability and transparency of corrective methods, and on the opposition between two fairness criteria, namely Demographic Parity and Equalized Odds. Our main argument is that even as a gap in Demographic Parity is used to diagnose inequality between groups, Equalized Odds constitutes a more reliable fairness crit
Record details
Published: 28 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 28 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
KAISEN: Reproducible Subgroup Fairness Auditing for Clinical Risk Models
arXiv cs.LG · 30 July 2026
Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 23 July 2026
Trustworthy Privacy-Preserving Multimodal Federated Learning for Personalised Breast Cancer Prediction
arXiv · 21 July 2026
Trustworthy AI in Digital Health: A Comprehensive Review of Robustness and Explainability
arXiv · 3 August 2026
GoT-CD: Graph-of-Thoughts Causal Discovery and the Fragility of Post-hoc Path-Specific Fairness Audits
arXiv fairness query · 3 August 2026
Demographically-Conditioned Synthetic Medical Images for Bias Mitigation and Bias Detection in Disease Classifiers
arXiv · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 July 2026), “Fairness Interventions in Classification: A Study on AI Explainability,” evidence record 13812, https://ethics.ai/record/13812 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.