A principled way to think about AI in education: guidance for educators and policy makers based on goals, models of human learning, and use of technologies
arXiv:2510.01467v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies has the potential to dramatically influence higher education, raising questions about the roles of institutions, educators, and students in a technology-rich future. While existing discourse often emphasizes either the promise and peril of AI or its immediate implementation, this paper advances a third path: a principled framework for guiding the use of AI i
Record details
Published: 27 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 27 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Rethinking Classifier-Free Guidance in On-Policy Diffusion Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 26 July 2026
Outcome-Confounded Local Supervision in On-Policy Distillation
arXiv cs.LG · 26 July 2026
Rethinking Classifier-Free Guidance in On-Policy Diffusion Distillation
arXiv cs.AI · 27 July 2026
Weak-to-Strong On-Policy Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 27 July 2026
Pass the Baton: Trajectory-Relayed On-Policy Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 27 July 2026
A Framework for Developing University Policies on Generative AI Governance: A Cross-national Comparative Study
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “A principled way to think about AI in education: guidance for educators and policy makers based on goals, models of human learning, and use of technologies,” evidence record 13586, https://ethics.ai/record/13586 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.