Bridging Expert Knowledge and Automated Feature Engineering via Self-Evolution
In high-stakes settings such as brand compliance, clinical care, and content moderation, machine learning cannot be deployed as opaque oracles: practitioners inspect the features driving model decisions, and models must leverage the expert documentation governing these domains. In practice, the data arrives as unstructured content, and features extracted from it must be interpretable, discriminative, and aligned with what experts consider important. Existing methods fall short: they target tabul
Record details
Published: 7 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Testing the Black Box: Structural Barriers to Independent Evaluation of Consumer-Facing Health LLMs
arXiv · 7 June 2026
Beyond the Algorithm: Professional Experiences and Perceptions of AI Bias
arXiv · 13 June 2026
Bridging Geographic Bias in Urban Streetscape Inference via Lifelong Learning with Visual-Semantic Pivoting
arXiv · 13 June 2026
AgentFairBench: Do LLM Agents Discriminate When They Act?
arXiv · 15 June 2026
Moral Safety in LLMs: Exposing Performative Compliance with Puzzled Cues
arXiv · 30 June 2026
Constance Viehbeck
LSE Data Science Institute · 6 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 June 2026), “Bridging Expert Knowledge and Automated Feature Engineering via Self-Evolution,” evidence record 1281, https://ethics.ai/record/1281 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.