From Novelty to Normalisation: Tracking Changing Perceptions of AI in Higher Education, 2024-2026
arXiv:2607.16223v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has reshaped the landscape of higher education. Students have embraced tools such as ChatGPT with striking speed, while teaching staff and institutions have responded with greater caution. Existing research on AI perceptions has mainly been cross-sectional, providing single-point snapshots that view attitudes as stable rather than evolving. This paper presents a longitudinal study of
Record details
Published: 21 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Children & education
Retrieved: 21 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
When AI Takes the Couch: Psychometric Jailbreaks Reveal Internal Conflict in Frontier Models
arXiv cs.CY · 21 July 2026
Platform Choice, Trust, and Privacy in the Consumer AI Assistant Market
arXiv cs.CY · 17 July 2026
Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning in Radiology Reports: A Comparative Evaluation of Tokenizer-Driven Privacy Risks
arXiv cs.LG · 15 July 2026
A Comparative Analysis of Institutional and Course Generative AI Policies within Higher Education: Implications for Instruction in Computing Education
arXiv cs.CY · 15 July 2026
Teacher feedback and ChatGPT feedback on Chinese university EFL learners’ English essay revision: A mixed-methods study
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
An exploratory machine learning approach to understanding determinants of future ChatGPT use in higher education
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (21 July 2026), “From Novelty to Normalisation: Tracking Changing Perceptions of AI in Higher Education, 2024-2026,” evidence record 11930, https://ethics.ai/record/11930 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.