Student Evaluation of Repeated AI Feedback Across a Semester of Writing
Generative AI is increasingly used for feedback in higher education, but evidence from repeated classroom use remains limited. This short paper analyses 2988 reflective essay-feedback-appraisal instances from 283 Estonian bachelor students across one semester. Students obtained and assessed feedback from a self-selected AI tool using a uniform prompt. The present analysis of the anonymized text corpus covers essay content, AI feedback, and its perceived helpfulness. Students found feedback helpf
Record details
Published: 17 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 20 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
CADENCE: Closing the Reasoning Gap via Coverage-Adaptive On-Policy Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 17 July 2026
On the Failure of Boundary-Seeking Distillation in Bottlenecked Generative Architectures
arXiv cs.AI · 17 July 2026
EduGuard: A Safe RAG-Based LLM Tutor for Programming Education
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Comparing human and LLM ordered coding of qualitative data: How coding differences cascade through temporal analysis
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 18 July 2026
AI Literacy-Related Domains and AI-TPACK Readiness Among Preservice Mathematics Teachers: A Factor-Informed Structural Equation Modelling Study
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 18 July 2026
Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS)
arXiv cs.CY · 17 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 July 2026), “Student Evaluation of Repeated AI Feedback Across a Semester of Writing,” evidence record 11864, https://ethics.ai/record/11864 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.