{
  "id": 11864,
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16115v1",
  "title": "Student Evaluation of Repeated AI Feedback Across a Semester of Writing",
  "summary": "Generative AI is increasingly used for feedback in higher education, but evidence from repeated classroom use remains limited. This short paper analyses 2988 reflective essay-feedback-appraisal instances from 283 Estonian bachelor students across one semester. Students obtained and assessed feedback from a self-selected AI tool using a uniform prompt. The present analysis of the anonymized text corpus covers essay content, AI feedback, and its perceived helpfulness. Students found feedback helpf",
  "authors": "Andres Karjus, Janika Leoste, Tiia Õun",
  "category": "research",
  "topics": "children-education",
  "orgs": null,
  "regions": null,
  "published_at": "2026-07-17T16:53:00.000Z",
  "fetched_at": "2026-07-20T05:10:09.534Z",
  "source_slug": "x-arxiv-cs-hc",
  "source_name": "arXiv cs.HC",
  "source_homepage": "https://arxiv.org/list/cs.HC/recent",
  "ethics_ai_record_url": "https://ethics.ai/record/11864",
  "original_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16115v1",
  "evidence_status": "source-only",
  "attribution": "via ethics.ai"
}