Comparing human and LLM ordered coding of qualitative data: How coding differences cascade through temporal analysis
Publication date: Available online 16 July 2026 Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence Author(s): Kamila Misiejuk, Sonsoles López-Pernas, Eduardo Araujo Oliveira, Brendan Eagan, Mohammed Saqr
Record details
Published: 18 July 2026
Source: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 18 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
AI Literacy-Related Domains and AI-TPACK Readiness Among Preservice Mathematics Teachers: A Factor-Informed Structural Equation Modelling Study
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 18 July 2026
CADENCE: Closing the Reasoning Gap via Coverage-Adaptive On-Policy Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 17 July 2026
Student Evaluation of Repeated AI Feedback Across a Semester of Writing
arXiv cs.HC · 17 July 2026
On the Failure of Boundary-Seeking Distillation in Bottlenecked Generative Architectures
arXiv cs.AI · 17 July 2026
EduGuard: A Safe RAG-Based LLM Tutor for Programming Education
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS)
arXiv cs.CY · 17 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (18 July 2026), “Comparing human and LLM ordered coding of qualitative data: How coding differences cascade through temporal analysis,” evidence record 11438, https://ethics.ai/record/11438 (originally published by Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.