Governing Artificial Intelligence: Public Preferences and Regulatory Options
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming economies, societies, and polities, raising fundamental questions about how it should be regulated. Policymakers face choices over whether to prioritize innovation or safety, rely on public oversight or private self-regulation, and govern nationally or internationally. Yet little is known about how citizens evaluate these competing priorities. Here we report a conjoint survey experiment conducted in seven countries with diverse political and e
Record details
Published: 16 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 18 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Open user innovation, producer innovation and industrial dynamics: An ABM approach
Research Policy · 16 July 2026
Democratizing Agent Deployment Safety: A Structural Monitoring Approach
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Post-Deployment Accountability in AI Governance: A Cross-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of AI Incidents
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
The Efficiency Costs of Information Assurance in AI-Enabled Labor Markets: Evidence from LinkedIn's Policy Changes
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
Design of policy digital twins incorporating multi-level agent based modelling
arXiv cs.CY · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 July 2026), “Governing Artificial Intelligence: Public Preferences and Regulatory Options,” evidence record 11362, https://ethics.ai/record/11362 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.