Harvard cancer researchers earn retraction for image duplication
A group of researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston have lost a paper for image duplication following an investigation by the two institutions. The paper, published in September 2019 in the Journal of Experimental Medicine, described a treatment for tumors caused by a disorder called tuberous sclerosis complex. Several … Continue reading Harvard cancer researchers earn retraction for image duplication
Record details
Published: 16 July 2026
Source: Retraction Watch
Category: News
Topics: Healthcare · Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 17 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Ethics journal retracts paper by high school student for AI, peer review manipulation
Retraction Watch · 6 July 2026
Sage retracts eight papers by former Radboud ‘rising star’ for compromised peer-review process
Retraction Watch · 14 July 2026
What We Know About the Government’s Investigations Into Medical Schools
Inside Higher Ed Tech · 29 July 2026
Retraction Watch story exposing research factory fuels investigations, preprint withdrawals, termination
Retraction Watch · 31 July 2026
BMJ Group retracts paper on COVID-19 vaccines and mortality featured in Senate hearing
Retraction Watch · 11 August 2026
How Trump’s Anti-DEI Shift Unraveled a Successful Federal Investment in Maine Schools
The 74 (education AI) · 12 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 July 2026), “Harvard cancer researchers earn retraction for image duplication,” evidence record 11151, https://ethics.ai/record/11151 (originally published by Retraction Watch).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.