Ethics journal retracts paper by high school student for AI, peer review manipulation
The Journal of Medical Ethics has retracted a paper on the use of AI in the pharmaceutical industry for containing references that don’t exist. The article’s sole author: a high school student. The paper, which argues biased algorithms can exacerbate inequities in health care, was published in September. The author, Irfan Biswas, listed his affiliation … Continue reading Ethics journal retracts paper by high school student for AI, peer review manipulation
Record details
Published: 6 July 2026
Source: Retraction Watch
Category: News
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare · Children & education · Biotech
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Harvard cancer researchers earn retraction for image duplication
Retraction Watch · 16 July 2026
BMJ Group retracts paper on COVID-19 vaccines and mortality featured in Senate hearing
Retraction Watch · 11 August 2026
Biology journal pulls 100+ articles and counting from special issues for peer review manipulation
Retraction Watch · 12 August 2026
Constance Viehbeck
LSE Data Science Institute · 6 July 2026
“Antisocial Today and Also Always”?: A Qualitative Examination of Engineering Students’ Social Considerations in Robot Design for Healthcare
Science and Engineering Ethics · 24 July 2026
TriEval: A Resource-Efficient Pipeline for LLM Bias, Toxicity, and Truthfulness Assessment
arXiv · 2 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 July 2026), “Ethics journal retracts paper by high school student for AI, peer review manipulation,” evidence record 2633, https://ethics.ai/record/2633 (originally published by Retraction Watch).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.