AI ethics evidence index Search
Source-linked daily record
Evidence record 10418 · automatically gathered

Sage retracts eight papers by former Radboud ‘rising star’ for compromised peer-review process

The publisher Sage has retracted eight papers by a former “rising star” from a Dutch university for a “compromised” peer-review process at a journal he edited. Last week, Retraction Watch obtained an email from an editor at Sage to the editorial board of Group & Organization Management, stating that, following a “thorough investigation,” the publisher … Continue reading Sage retracts eight papers by former Radboud ‘rising star’ for compromised peer-review process

Record details

Published: 14 July 2026
Source: Retraction Watch
Category: News
Topics: Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 15 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Finance, VC & PE

Harvard cancer researchers earn retraction for image duplication

Retraction Watch · 16 July 2026

Same publisher byline

Ethics journal retracts paper by high school student for AI, peer review manipulation

Retraction Watch · 6 July 2026

Same publisher byline

Editors of economics journal resign after association renews Taylor & Francis contract

Retraction Watch · 23 July 2026

Same publisher byline

A composer published a paper on theoretical physics. His lack of credentials drew criticism.

Retraction Watch · 5 August 2026

Same publisher byline

Clarivate removes hold on mega-journal Heliyon after internal audit, 650+ retractions

Retraction Watch · 7 August 2026

Same publisher byline

BMJ Group retracts paper on COVID-19 vaccines and mortality featured in Senate hearing

Retraction Watch · 11 August 2026

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Sage retracts eight papers by former Radboud ‘rising star’ for compromised peer-review process,” evidence record 10418, https://ethics.ai/record/10418 (originally published by Retraction Watch).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.