Interaction Density as a Behavioural Signature of Exhibit Type: A Minimal-Log Study from a Two-Venue Science Experience Centre
Understanding how visitors engage with interactive exhibits usually calls for either labour-intensive manual observation or invasive multimodal sensing -- eye-tracking, cameras, wearables -- that few science centres can deploy at scale. We ask how much can be learned instead from the handful of fields that most touch-enabled exhibits already log by default: a session's start time, end time, and press count. Analysing 2,816 visitor sessions across eight exhibits at two venues of a science experie
Record details
Published: 15 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 16 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Tracking the evolution of case law with main path analysis
Artificial Intelligence and Law · 1 July 2026
When AI Does the Work, What Is Learning For? Post-Instrumental Learning and the Risk of Capacity Dissolution
arXiv · 30 July 2026
When AI Does the Work, What Is Learning For? Post-Instrumental Learning and the Risk of Capacity Dissolution
arXiv cs.CY · 31 July 2026
Designing Automation Boundaries for Trustworthy Smart Medication Support
arXiv cs.HC · 27 June 2026
Balanced Workforce: Governance-by-Design for Privacy-Preserving Inter-Firm Workforce Leasing
arXiv · 17 June 2026
IUU+DB: Tracking Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing, Seafood Fraud, and Labor Abuse through LLM-driven Information Extraction
arXiv · 16 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 July 2026), “Interaction Density as a Behavioural Signature of Exhibit Type: A Minimal-Log Study from a Two-Venue Science Experience Centre,” evidence record 10925, https://ethics.ai/record/10925 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.