Developing a Core Outcome Set for the Evaluation of Remote Patient Monitoring Interventions Using the Sextuple Aim: Modified Delphi Study
Background: The rapid expansion of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions highlights the need for their comparison and evaluation. Current evaluation frameworks often fail to capture a multistakeholder perspective. Traditional health technology assessment approaches emphasize health and economic outcomes, providing an incomplete picture of RPM’s broader impact. The Sextuple Aim, encompassing health outcomes, costs, patient and provider experience, equity, and sustainability, offers a more
Record details
Published: 15 July 2026
Source: JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare
Retrieved: 16 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Demographically-Conditioned Synthetic Medical Images for Bias Mitigation and Bias Detection in Disease Classifiers
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterization
arXiv · 15 July 2026
Adaptive Filtering of the KV Cache: Diagnosing and Correcting Structural-Role Bias in LLM Inference
arXiv · 14 July 2026
Hindsight: Similarity-Based Analytics for Mars Rover Drive Retrieval
arXiv cs.HC · 17 July 2026
Equity-Oriented Design Processes and Evaluation of Digital Health Technologies for Black Communities Beyond Usability: Scoping Review
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 20 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 July 2026), “Developing a Core Outcome Set for the Evaluation of Remote Patient Monitoring Interventions Using the Sextuple Aim: Modified Delphi Study,” evidence record 10695, https://ethics.ai/record/10695 (originally published by JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.