Equity-Oriented Design Processes and Evaluation of Digital Health Technologies for Black Communities Beyond Usability: Scoping Review
Background: Black communities face disproportionate burdens of health disparities such as chronic disease, maternal morbidity, and barriers to accessing quality care. Digital health technologies (DHTs) are increasingly promoted as tools to reduce health disparities through access to care. However, the extent to which equity-oriented design approaches have been applied to address the needs of Black communities remains unclear. Objective: This scoping review aims to examine (1) current literature
Record details
Published: 20 July 2026
Source: JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare
Retrieved: 21 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Public perceptions of AI-driven decision-making in healthcare: A structural equation modeling approach
arXiv · 21 July 2026
Quality Action Assurance: Multimodal Verification of Examiner Claims in VR OSCEs
arXiv · 21 July 2026
Trustworthy Privacy-Preserving Multimodal Federated Learning for Personalised Breast Cancer Prediction
arXiv · 21 July 2026
AI interventions in cancer screening: balancing equity and cost-effectiveness
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
Hindsight: Similarity-Based Analytics for Mars Rover Drive Retrieval
arXiv cs.HC · 17 July 2026
Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 23 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 July 2026), “Equity-Oriented Design Processes and Evaluation of Digital Health Technologies for Black Communities Beyond Usability: Scoping Review,” evidence record 12051, https://ethics.ai/record/12051 (originally published by JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.