A Longitudinal Analysis of Public Discourse on AI Ethics in Education Using Twitter Data
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI) into education presents significant opportunities to enhance teaching and learning, while raising ethical concerns about the responsible use of these technologies in educational settings. Understanding how the public perceives and debates these issues is increasingly important for educators, institutions, and policymakers seeking to integrate AI responsibly and equitably. Social media platforms, where such debates un
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 15 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Grade Encoding and the Structural Representation of Student Academic Trajectories
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Faster Completion, Less Learning: Generative AI Reduced Study Time on Math Problems and the Knowledge They Build
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
The Evolving Media Discourse on ChatGPT and Higher Education
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Commenting with Copilot: A Taxonomy and Multi-Year Analysis of Student Code-Generation Specifications
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Uncovering Students' Mental Models of Generative Artificial Intelligence
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Programming Language Policy as an AI Literacy Equity Problem: A 15-Nation Comparative Analysis
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “A Longitudinal Analysis of Public Discourse on AI Ethics in Education Using Twitter Data,” evidence record 10349, https://ethics.ai/record/10349 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.