Self-Regulated Reading with AI Support: An Eight-Week Study with Students
arXiv:2602.09907v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: College students increasingly use AI chatbots to support academic reading, yet we lack granular understanding of how these interactions shape their reading experience and cognitive engagement. We conducted an eight-week longitudinal study with 15 undergraduates who used AI to support assigned readings in a course. We collected 838 prompts across 239 reading sessions and developed a coding schema categorizing prompts into four cognitive th
Record details
Published: 15 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 15 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Diagnosing and Calibrating Tool-Call Boundary Drift in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 14 July 2026
Demystifying On-Policy Distillation: Roles, Pathologies, and Regulations
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 14 July 2026
AI avatars are reshaping society in China — the law is trying to catch up
Nature Machine Intelligence · 14 July 2026
From ethical principles to executable governance: A policy-as-code framework for trustworthy AI in higher education
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Understanding regional readiness to contribute to the bioeconomy: The role of higher education institutions and other regional characteristics
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
From AI anxiety to strategic regulation: How university students transform generative AI into a strategic learning resource
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 July 2026), “Self-Regulated Reading with AI Support: An Eight-Week Study with Students,” evidence record 10319, https://ethics.ai/record/10319 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.