Evidence record 9831 · automatically gathered

Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary?

Currently there is a broad consensus among scholars that artificial intelligence (AI) tools can be used in research and publication, and that their use should be disclosed. Publishers and influential organizations, like the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, have developed different and sometimes contradictory disclosure policies. We review some of these policies, examine the ethical reasons for disclosing AI use in research, and develop a framework for disclosure. We distinguis

Record details

Published: 24 March 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (24 March 2025), “Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary?,” evidence record 9831, https://ethics.ai/record/9831 (originally published by OpenAlex).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.