Guiding AI in radiology: ESR’s recommendations for effective implementation of the European AI Act
This statement has been produced within the European Society of Radiology AI Working Group and identifies the key policies of the EU AI Act as they pertain to medical imaging. It offers specific recommendations to policymakers and the professional community for the effective implementation of the legislation, addressing potential gaps and uncertainties. Key areas include AI literacy, classification rules for high-risk AI systems, data governance, transparency, human oversight, quality management
Record details
Published: 13 February 2025
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Explainable AI for the EU Right to Explanation: A Systematic Review of the Law-XAI Translation Gap
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
Adoption and Effectiveness of AI-Based Anomaly Detection for Cross Provider Health Data Exchange
arXiv · 19 March 2026
Behavioural feasible set: Value alignment constraints on AI decision support
arXiv · 22 March 2026
Governed Reasoning for Institutional AI
arXiv · 12 April 2026
A Proposed Biomedical Data Policy Framework to Reduce Fragmentation, Improve Quality, and Incentivize Sharing in Indian Healthcare in the era of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health
arXiv · 13 April 2026
enclawed: A Configurable, Sector-Neutral Hardening Framework for Single-User AI Assistant Gateways
arXiv · 18 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 February 2025), “Guiding AI in radiology: ESR’s recommendations for effective implementation of the European AI Act,” evidence record 9787, https://ethics.ai/record/9787 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.