Assessing the research landscape and clinical utility of large language models: a scoping review
IMPORTANCE: Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's ChatGPT are powerful generative systems that rapidly synthesize natural language responses. Research on LLMs has revealed their potential and pitfalls, especially in clinical settings. However, the evolving landscape of LLM research in medicine has left several gaps regarding their evaluation, application, and evidence base. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to (1) summarize current research evidence on the accuracy and efficacy of LLMs in
Record details
Published: 12 March 2024
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Mental-LLM
OpenAlex · 6 March 2024
The application of large language models in medicine: A scoping review
OpenAlex · 23 April 2024
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Medicine and Healthcare: Applications, Considerations, Limitations, Motivation and Challenges
OpenAlex · 4 January 2024
Generative AI for Transformative Healthcare: A Comprehensive Study of Emerging Models, Applications, Case Studies, and Limitations
OpenAlex · 1 January 2024
Opportunities and challenges for ChatGPT and large language models in biomedicine and health
OpenAlex · 22 November 2023
A study of generative large language model for medical research and healthcare
OpenAlex · 16 November 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 March 2024), “Assessing the research landscape and clinical utility of large language models: a scoping review,” evidence record 9646, https://ethics.ai/record/9646 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.