The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
This systematic review evaluates the application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model in higher education, analyzing 162 SSCI/SCI-E articles from 2008 to 2022. It reveals a predominant focus on student participants from Asia and North America. Mobile learning tools are the most studied technologies. Surveys continue to be the top data gathering method, while structural equation modeling is preferred for analysis. The Technology Acceptance Model is combined most
Record details
Published: 1 January 2024
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses
OpenAlex · 23 January 2025
Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review
OpenAlex · 17 April 2022
No Reader Left Behind: Multi-Agent Summaries Everyone Can Understand
arXiv · 12 April 2026
Regulating Artificial Intimacy: From Locks and Blocks to Relational Accountability
arXiv · 20 April 2026
Socio-Conformal Calibration in Complex Survey Data: Marginal Validity Is Not Enough for Subgroup Reliability
arXiv · 7 May 2026
Cost-of-Ethics Crisis: Beliefs, Decisions, and Justifications in the Job Searches of Computer Science Students in Canada and the United States
arXiv · 10 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 January 2024), “The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review,” evidence record 9588, https://ethics.ai/record/9588 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.