Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models
Large generative AI models (LGAIMs), such as ChatGPT, GPT-4 or Stable Diffusion, are rapidly transforming the way we communicate, illustrate, and create. However, AI regulation, in the EU and beyond, has primarily focused on conventional AI models, not LGAIMs. This paper will situate these new generative models in the current debate on trustworthy AI regulation, and ask how the law can be tailored to their capabilities. After laying technical foundations, the legal part of the paper proceeds in
Record details
Published: 12 June 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Geopolitical alignment: Endorsement effects in large language models
arXiv · 10 July 2026
Shadow AI in Swedish Health Care: Qualitative Analysis of Physicians’ Free-Text Answers
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 28 July 2026
ChatGPT Didn't Break the AI Act. It Showed Why Adaptive Regulation Matters
Tech Policy Press · 20 July 2026
OpenAI notified EU of Hugging Face hack under AI Act
Euractiv Digital · 23 July 2026
Europe bears its teeth, political panic about OpenAI hack and YouTube refines partner policy
Everything in Moderation (Ben Whitelaw) · 24 July 2026
GEMA vs. OpenAI | AI memorisation is a reproduction relevant to copyright law, and the TDM exception does not help in LLM training, Munich I Regional Court holds
AI Incident Database · 26 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 June 2023), “Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models,” evidence record 9378, https://ethics.ai/record/9378 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.