GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
We investigate the potential implications of large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs), on the U.S. labor market, focusing on the increased capabilities arising from LLM-powered software compared to LLMs on their own. Using a new rubric, we assess occupations based on their alignment with LLM capabilities, integrating both human expertise and GPT-4 classifications. Our findings reveal that around 80% of the U.S. workforce could have at least 10% of their wo
Record details
Published: 17 March 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Jobs & economy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Working Memory Constraints Scaffold Learning in Transformers under Data Scarcity
arXiv · 22 April 2026
Subtitle-Aligned Fine-Tuning of Whisper for Swiss German ASR: Benchmark Contamination, Convention Mismatch, and an Honest Baseline at 25.6% WER (13.8% cWER)
arXiv · 29 May 2026
OpenAI built an AI super-hacker to break its own models, then locked it away
The Next Web AI · 15 July 2026
Building AI infrastructure with the Effingham County community
OpenAI · 22 July 2026
Fields Medalist who published a paper on AI-driven human extinction now works for OpenAI
The Decoder · 8 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 March 2023), “GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models,” evidence record 9340, https://ethics.ai/record/9340 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.