Artificial intelligence in medical education: a cross-sectional needs assessment
BACKGROUND: As the information age wanes, enabling the prevalence of the artificial intelligence age; expectations, responsibilities, and job definitions need to be redefined for those who provide services in healthcare. This study examined the perceptions of future physicians on the possible influences of artificial intelligence on medicine, and to determine the needs that might be helpful for curriculum restructuring. METHODS: A cross-sectional multi-centre study was conducted among medical st
Record details
Published: 9 November 2022
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Healthcare · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults
OpenAlex · 15 November 2021
A Review on Virtual Reality Skill Training Applications
OpenAlex · 30 April 2021
Beyond Symbolic Control: Societal Consequences of AI-Driven Workforce Displacement and the Imperative for Genuine Human Oversight Architectures
arXiv · 31 March 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Empathy and the Human-Moment Gaps of AI Chatbots: Insights from Empathy Displacement Theory
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
How a Healthy Work Culture Help s Trauma Survivors
MIT Sloan Management Review AI · 30 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 November 2022), “Artificial intelligence in medical education: a cross-sectional needs assessment,” evidence record 9148, https://ethics.ai/record/9148 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.