Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review
Abstract This paper addresses quantitative meta-analyses on corporate governance-related determinants and firms’ (non) financial consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Legitimacy theory as our theoretical framework assumes that, through a social contract, a company must fulfil the respective society’s values and expectations and gain legitimacy. We also rely on the business case argument, assuming a positive relationship between CSR and financial outcomes of the firm. This analys
Record details
Published: 18 March 2021
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Analysis of Public Attitudes on Facebook and Twitter Toward COVID-19 Vaccines in the United Kingdom and the United States: Observational Study
OpenAlex · 31 January 2021
The Metaverse as a Virtual Form of Smart Cities: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Urban Futures
OpenAlex · 8 July 2022
Meta-Aligner: Bidirectional Preference-Policy Optimization for Multi-Objective LLMs Alignment
arXiv · 27 April 2026
Algorithmic Constitutionalism
arXiv · 16 May 2026
AMR-SD: Asymmetric Meta-Reflective Self-Distillation for Token-Level Credit Assignment
arXiv · 18 May 2026
Meta-Benchmarks for Financial-Services LLM Evaluation
arXiv · 2 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (18 March 2021), “Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review,” evidence record 8963, https://ethics.ai/record/8963 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.