Evidence record 5320 · automatically gathered

Meta-Aligner: Bidirectional Preference-Policy Optimization for Multi-Objective LLMs Alignment

Multi-Objective Alignment aims to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with diverse and often conflicting human values by optimizing multiple objectives simultaneously. Existing methods predominantly rely on static preference weight construction strategies. However, rigidly aligning to fixed targets discards valuable intermediate information, as training responses inherently embody valid preference trade-offs even when deviating from the target. To address this limitation, we propose Meal, i.e., M

Record details

Published: 27 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (27 April 2026), “Meta-Aligner: Bidirectional Preference-Policy Optimization for Multi-Objective LLMs Alignment,” evidence record 5320, https://ethics.ai/record/5320 (originally published by arXiv).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.