FinRED: An Expert-Guided Benchmark Generation and Evaluation Framework for Financial LLM Red-Teaming
Existing safety benchmarks target general adversarial scenarios but miss finance-specific risks. Financial LLMs face regulatory compliance violations, fraud facilitation, and systemic trust erosion that require targeted evaluation. We introduce FinRED, an expert-guided red-teaming framework for financial LLM safety evaluation developed with financial experts. FinRED uses a novel two-level taxonomy mapping global standards (e.g., FATF and EU DORA) to threats ranging from regulatory evasion to com
Record details
Published: 18 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Geopolitical alignment: Endorsement effects in large language models
arXiv · 10 July 2026
From Licensing to Open Access: Designing a Sustainable Transition in Operational Weather Data
arXiv · 20 May 2026
From Reactive to Proactive: A Multi-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of 480 AI Incidents and a Data-Driven Governance Compliance Framework
arXiv · 10 April 2026
China works on AI safety benchmark as regulators target large model risks
SCMP Tech (HK/CN) · 13 July 2026
Can Europe’s new AI safety regime tame US rogue agents — and Chinese ambitions?
Politico Europe Technology · 27 July 2026
Challenges to Grassroots Organization Engagement with AI Policy
arXiv · 18 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (18 June 2026), “FinRED: An Expert-Guided Benchmark Generation and Evaluation Framework for Financial LLM Red-Teaming,” evidence record 820, https://ethics.ai/record/820 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.