Evidence record 8068 · automatically gathered

Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation

In recent months, researchers,1 government bodies,2 and the media3 have claimed that a ‘right to explanation’ of decisions made by automated and artificially intelligent algorithmic systems is legally mandated by the forthcoming European Union General Data Protection Regulation4 2016/679 (GDPR). The right to explanation is viewed as a promising mechanism in the broader pursuit by government and industry for accountability and transparency in algorithms, artificial intelligence, robotics, and oth

Record details

Published: 11 April 2017
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Privacy · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (11 April 2017), “Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation,” evidence record 8068, https://ethics.ai/record/8068 (originally published by OpenAlex).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.