Resume Screening, Fast and Slow: (Biased) AI Recommendations' Influence on Human Decision Making
AI is increasingly being used collaboratively with people to make decisions in high-stakes domains, but this new paradigm is still not well-understood in many respects -- particularly regarding how AI that replicates human social biases influences people's decision making processes and how that can influence outcomes. In this study, we analyzed the time people spend viewing candidate resumes from an experiment investigating biased AI resume screening to evaluate decision-making fairness and cogn
Record details
Published: 20 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
PeerCheck: Enhancing LLM-Generated Academic Reviews Towards Human-Level Quality
arXiv · 18 June 2026
Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images
arXiv · 26 June 2026
Investigating Gender Bias in Touch Biometrics
arXiv · 9 June 2026
Neutrality Bites: Gender Representation in AI-Generated Animal Stories
arXiv · 6 June 2026
Quota Marketplace: Dynamic Pricing for Efficient Allocation of ML Training Resources
arXiv fairness query · 9 July 2026
What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection
arXiv · 10 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 June 2026), “Resume Screening, Fast and Slow: (Biased) AI Recommendations' Influence on Human Decision Making,” evidence record 742, https://ethics.ai/record/742 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.