Fair Lung Disease Diagnosis from Chest CT via Gender-Adversarial Attention Multiple Instance Learning
We present a fairness-aware framework for multi-class lung disease diagnosis from chest CT volumes, developed for the Fair Disease Diagnosis Challenge at the PHAROS-AIF-MIH Workshop (CVPR 2026). The challenge requires classifying CT scans into four categories -- Healthy, COVID-19, Adenocarcinoma, and Squamous Cell Carcinoma -- with performance measured as the average of per-gender macro F1 scores, explicitly penalizing gender-inequitable predictions. Our approach addresses two core difficulties:
Record details
Published: 13 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Front-End Ethics for Sensor-Fused Health Conversational Agents: An Ethical Design Space for Biometrics
arXiv · 14 March 2026
PGcGAN: Pathological Gait-Conditioned GAN for Human Gait Synthesis
arXiv · 15 March 2026
Anterior's Approach to Fairness Evaluation of Automated Prior Authorization System
arXiv · 15 March 2026
FairMed-XGB: A Bayesian-Optimised Multi-Metric Framework with Explainability for Demographic Equity in Critical Healthcare Data
arXiv · 16 March 2026
Ethical Fairness in Ubiquitous Health Sensing without Known Attributes
arXiv · 10 March 2026
Evaluating Causal Discovery Algorithms for Path-Specific Fairness and Utility in Healthcare
arXiv · 16 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 March 2026), “Fair Lung Disease Diagnosis from Chest CT via Gender-Adversarial Attention Multiple Instance Learning,” evidence record 7278, https://ethics.ai/record/7278 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.