World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO): Mapping an Emerging Institution in the Global AI Governance Regime Complex
Who sets the rules for artificial intelligence, and on what terms, has become a defining question of global governance. For several years that contest ran through principles and ethics codes; it now runs through institutions. China's proposed World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) is the most consequential recent entrant and the least examined. We place WAICO within the emerging regime complex for AI and argue that its importance lies not in any single commitment but in t
Record details
Published: 22 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
CHILLGuard: Towards Fine-Grained Chinese LLM Safety Guardrail with Scalable Data Construction and Model-aware Preference Alignment
arXiv · 13 June 2026
Geopolitical alignment: Endorsement effects in large language models
arXiv · 10 July 2026
AlignAtt4LLM: Fast AlignAtt for Decoder-Only LLMs at IWSLT 2026 Simultaneous Speech Translation Task
arXiv · 2 June 2026
Digital innovation as a bank risk mitigator: Empirical insights from Chinese commercial banks
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
Greening but concentrating? The unintended effects of China's voluntary participatory environmental regulations on firms' innovation portfolios
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
Smart cities, unequal outcomes: Artificial intelligence, environmental regulation, and urban carbon distribution in China
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 June 2026), “World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO): Mapping an Emerging Institution in the Global AI Governance Regime Complex,” evidence record 683, https://ethics.ai/record/683 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.