From Logic Monopoly to Social Contract: Separation of Power and the Institutional Foundations for Autonomous Agent Economies
Existing multi-agent frameworks allow each agent to simultaneously plan, execute, and evaluate its own actions -- a structural deficiency we term the "Logic Monopoly." Empirical evidence quantifies the resulting "Reliability Gap": 84.30% average attack success rates across ten deployment scenarios, 31.4% emergent deceptive behavior without explicit reward signals, and cascading failure modes rooted in six structural bottlenecks. The remedy is not better alignment of individual models but a socia
Record details
Published: 26 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governance by Design: A Parsonian Institutional Architecture for Internet-Wide Agent Societies
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Large Language Model Guided Incentive Aware Reward Design for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · 25 March 2026
BeliefShift: Benchmarking Temporal Belief Consistency and Opinion Drift in LLM Agents
arXiv · 25 March 2026
Mimetic Alignment with ASPECT: Evaluation of AI-inferred Personal Profiles
arXiv · 27 March 2026
From Actions to Understanding: Conformal Interpretability of Temporal Concepts in LLM Agents
arXiv · 27 March 2026
TRAP: Hijacking VLA CoT-Reasoning via Adversarial Patches
arXiv · 24 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (26 March 2026), “From Logic Monopoly to Social Contract: Separation of Power and the Institutional Foundations for Autonomous Agent Economies,” evidence record 6717, https://ethics.ai/record/6717 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.