Large Language Model Guided Incentive Aware Reward Design for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Designing effective auxiliary rewards for cooperative multi-agent systems remains challenging, as misaligned incentives can induce suboptimal coordination, particularly when sparse task rewards provide insufficient grounding for coordinated behavior. This study introduces an autonomous reward design framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to synthesize executable reward programs from environment instrumentation. The procedure constrains candidate programs within a formal validity envelo
Record details
Published: 25 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
From Actions to Understanding: Conformal Interpretability of Temporal Concepts in LLM Agents
arXiv · 27 March 2026
RAAP: Retrieval-Augmented Affordance Prediction with Cross-Image Action Alignment
arXiv · 31 March 2026
MALLES: A Multi-agent LLMs-based Economic Sandbox with Consumer Preference Alignment
arXiv · 18 March 2026
IntentScore: Intent-Conditioned Action Evaluation for Computer-Use Agents
arXiv · 6 April 2026
Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward Modeling
arXiv · 9 April 2026
CONSCIENTIA: Can LLM Agents Learn to Strategize? Emergent Deception and Trust in a Multi-Agent NYC Simulation
arXiv · 10 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (25 March 2026), “Large Language Model Guided Incentive Aware Reward Design for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,” evidence record 6766, https://ethics.ai/record/6766 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.