AD-CARE: A Guideline-grounded, Modality-agnostic LLM Agent for Real-world Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis with Multi-cohort Assessment, Fairness Analysis, and Reader Study
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge as populations age, and timely, accurate diagnosis is essential to reduce individual and societal burden. However, real-world AD assessment is hampered by incomplete, heterogeneous multimodal data and variability across sites and patient demographics. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in biomedicine, their use in AD has largely been confined to answering narrow, disease-specific questions rather than generating
Record details
Published: 26 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Front-End Ethics for Sensor-Fused Health Conversational Agents: An Ethical Design Space for Biometrics
arXiv · 14 March 2026
First, Do No Harm (With LLMs): Mitigating Racial Bias via Agentic Workflows
arXiv · 20 April 2026
GeoMind: An Agentic Workflow for Lithology Classification with Reasoned Tool Invocation
arXiv · 23 April 2026
Detecting Clinical Discrepancies in Health Coaching Agents: A Dual-Stream Memory and Reconciliation Architecture
arXiv · 29 April 2026
Reimagining psychiatric care with agentic AI: promise, challenges, and a roadmap forward
OpenAlex · 16 February 2026
To Call or Not to Call: Diagnosing Intrinsic Over-Calling Bias in LLM Agents
arXiv · 16 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (26 March 2026), “AD-CARE: A Guideline-grounded, Modality-agnostic LLM Agent for Real-world Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis with Multi-cohort Assessment, Fairness Analysis, and Reader Study,” evidence record 6705, https://ethics.ai/record/6705 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.