QoS-Aware Token Scheduling and Private Data Valuation for Multi-Modal Agentic Networks
In agentic systems, human-generated data records anchor the value of AI services. Yet cloud compute pipelines centralize processing on remote servers. Data centralization reduces personal data sovereignty and may potentially degrade the quality of service (QoS). Meanwhile, user contributions are diverse in quantity and quality: decentralized records can be biased, noisy, and heterogeneously distributed. To address the data challenge, we study fair token allocation and private data valuation for
Record details
Published: 2 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Agents & autonomy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Aligned Agents, Biased Swarm: Measuring Bias Amplification in Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv · 10 April 2026
Analysis Of Linguistic Stereotypes in Single and Multi-Agent Generative AI Architectures
arXiv · 19 March 2026
Static and Dynamic Strategies for Influencing Opinions in Social Networks
arXiv · 14 May 2026
Beyond Independent Manipulation: Individual Fairness-aware Strategic Classification with Peer Imitation
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Can Induced Emotion Bias LLM Behaviors in Sequential Decision Making?
arXiv cs.AI · 14 July 2026
Artificial intelligence and augmented intelligence collaboration: regaining trust and confidence in the financial sector
OpenAlex · 25 June 2018
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (2 April 2026), “QoS-Aware Token Scheduling and Private Data Valuation for Multi-Modal Agentic Networks,” evidence record 6477, https://ethics.ai/record/6477 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.