Designing Safe and Accountable GenAI as a Learning Companion with Women Banned from Formal Education
In gender-restrictive and surveilled contexts, where access to formal education may be restricted for women, pursuing education involves safety and privacy risks. When women are excluded from schools and universities, they often turn to online self-learning and generative AI (GenAI) to pursue their educational and career aspirations. However, we know little about what safe and accountable GenAI support is required in the context of surveillance, household responsibilities, and the absence of lea
Record details
Published: 8 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Privacy · Children & education · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
When AI Meets Early Childhood Education: Large Language Models as Assessment Teammates in Chinese Preschools
arXiv · 25 March 2026
ELEVATE: Designing Human-Centered GenAI Virtual Tutors for Scalable and Inclusive Education
arXiv · 17 June 2026
Federated and explainable learning analytics for privacy-preserving academic risk modeling across heterogeneous educational institutions
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Ethical use of artificial intelligence in education: proposed ethical competency framework for teachers
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 3 August 2026
Should we welcome robot teachers?
OpenAlex · 10 February 2016
EFF, TEDIC and CEJIL Challenge Secrecy in the Use of Face Recognition in Paraguay
EFF Deeplinks · 25 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (8 April 2026), “Designing Safe and Accountable GenAI as a Learning Companion with Women Banned from Formal Education,” evidence record 6184, https://ethics.ai/record/6184 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.