We Need Strong Preconditions For Using Simulations In Policy
Simulations, and more recently LLM agent simulations, have been adopted as useful tools for policymakers to explore interventions, rehearse potential scenarios, and forecast outcomes. While LLM simulations have enormous potential, two critical challenges remain understudied: the dual-use potential of accurate models of individual or population-level human behavior and the difficulty of validating simulation outputs. In light of these limitations, we must define boundaries for both simulation dev
Record details
Published: 9 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Learning Without Losing Identity: Capability Evolution for Embodied Agents
arXiv · 9 April 2026
The Accountability Horizon: An Impossibility Theorem for Governing Human-Agent Collectives
arXiv · 9 April 2026
Governed Capability Evolution: Lifecycle-Time Compatibility Checking and Rollback for AI-Component-Based Systems, with Embodied Agents as Case Study
arXiv · 9 April 2026
ASPECT:Analogical Semantic Policy Execution via Language Conditioned Transfer
arXiv · 9 April 2026
Agentic Copyright, Data Scraping & AI Governance: Toward a Coasean Bargain in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
arXiv · 8 April 2026
AgentCity: Constitutional Governance for Autonomous Agent Economies via Separation of Power
arXiv · 8 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 April 2026), “We Need Strong Preconditions For Using Simulations In Policy,” evidence record 6156, https://ethics.ai/record/6156 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.