ASPECT:Analogical Semantic Policy Execution via Language Conditioned Transfer
Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents often struggle to generalize knowledge to new tasks, even those structurally similar to ones they have mastered. Although recent approaches have attempted to mitigate this issue via zero-shot transfer, they are often constrained by predefined, discrete class systems, limiting their adaptability to novel or compositional task variations. We propose a significantly more generalized approach, replacing discrete latent variables with natural language conditioning v
Record details
Published: 9 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governed Capability Evolution: Lifecycle-Time Compatibility Checking and Rollback for AI-Component-Based Systems, with Embodied Agents as Case Study
arXiv · 9 April 2026
We Need Strong Preconditions For Using Simulations In Policy
arXiv · 9 April 2026
Learning Without Losing Identity: Capability Evolution for Embodied Agents
arXiv · 9 April 2026
The Accountability Horizon: An Impossibility Theorem for Governing Human-Agent Collectives
arXiv · 9 April 2026
Agentic Copyright, Data Scraping & AI Governance: Toward a Coasean Bargain in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
arXiv · 8 April 2026
AgentCity: Constitutional Governance for Autonomous Agent Economies via Separation of Power
arXiv · 8 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 April 2026), “ASPECT:Analogical Semantic Policy Execution via Language Conditioned Transfer,” evidence record 6116, https://ethics.ai/record/6116 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.