Creator Incentives in Recommender Systems: A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Approach for Stable and Fair Collaboration in Multi-Agent Bandits
User interactions in online recommendation platforms create interdependencies among content creators: feedback on one creator's content influences the system's learning and, in turn, the exposure of other creators' contents. To analyze incentives in such settings, we model collaboration as a multi-agent stochastic linear bandit problem with a transferable utility (TU) cooperative game formulation, where a coalition's value equals the negative sum of its members' cumulative regrets. We show that,
Record details
Published: 9 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SIM1: Physics-Aligned Simulator as Zero-Shot Data Scaler in Deformable Worlds
arXiv · 9 April 2026
From Safety Risk to Design Principle: Peer-Preservation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems and Its Implications for Orchestrated Democratic Discourse Analysis
arXiv · 9 April 2026
ASPECT:Analogical Semantic Policy Execution via Language Conditioned Transfer
arXiv · 9 April 2026
ACF: A Collaborative Framework for Agent Covert Communication under Cognitive Asymmetry
arXiv · 9 April 2026
Graph Query Generation with Constraint-guided Large Language Agents
arXiv · 9 April 2026
Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward Modeling
arXiv · 9 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 April 2026), “Creator Incentives in Recommender Systems: A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Approach for Stable and Fair Collaboration in Multi-Agent Bandits,” evidence record 6106, https://ethics.ai/record/6106 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.