A Regulatory Governance Framework for AI-Driven Financial Fraud Detection in U.S. Banking: Integrating OCC, SR 11-7, CFPB, and FinCEN Compliance Requirements for Model Development, Validation, and Monitoring Lifecycles
U.S. financial institutions deploying AI-based fraud detection face a fragmented compliance landscape spanning four regulatory frameworks -- OCC Bulletin 2011-12, SR 11-7, the CFPB AI circular, and FinCEN BSA/SAR requirements -- with no integrated governance life cycle connecting these requirements to model development, validation, and monitoring practice. This paper presents the Regulatory Governance Framework for AI-Driven Financial Fraud Detection (RGF-AFFD), a three-tier governance architect
Record details
Published: 14 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Explainable Graph Neural Networks for Interbank Contagion Surveillance: A Regulatory-Aligned Framework for the U.S. Banking Sector
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Enabling and Inhibitory Pathways of Students' AI Use Concealment Intention in Higher Education: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA
arXiv · 13 April 2026
From GPT-3 to GPT-5: Mapping their capabilities, scope, limitations, and consequences
arXiv · 11 April 2026
Informing AI Policy Assessment using Large-Scale Simulation of Interventions
arXiv · 20 April 2026
Democratizing Generative AI for Sustainable Competitive Advantage
arXiv · 22 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 April 2026), “A Regulatory Governance Framework for AI-Driven Financial Fraud Detection in U.S. Banking: Integrating OCC, SR 11-7, CFPB, and FinCEN Compliance Requirements for Model Development, Validation, and Monitoring Lifecycles,” evidence record 5886, https://ethics.ai/record/5886 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.