Pingquanqi (Equalizer): A Cross-Domain Sociotechnical Framework for Human-Agent Interaction Governance
LLM agents are transitioning from experimental tools to permanent infrastructure -- a computational layer as enduring as the electrical grid. Like any infrastructure, they carry a cost chain from physical capital through enterprise investment to user consumption, ending at the user's most irreplaceable resource: lifetime. When unoptimized, this chain leaks, consuming user lifetime without adequate compensation. This paper proposes Pingquanqi (Equalizer), a cross-domain sociotechnical framework f
Record details
Published: 25 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A field experiment of social influence and behavioral contagion with bots on Reddit
arXiv · 1 July 2026
A Practical Recipe Towards Improving Sim-and-Real Correlation for VLA Evaluation
arXiv · 9 June 2026
UR-VC: Unsupervised Robotic Value Correction for Time-Derived Progress Proxies
arXiv cs.AI · 14 July 2026
ToolAlignBench: Investigating Alignment Conflicts in Tool-Calling Enabled LLMs
arXiv · 15 July 2026
Towards Robust Reinforcement Learning for Small-Scale Language Model Agents
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 26 July 2026
Towards Robust Reinforcement Learning for Small-Scale Language Model Agents
arXiv · 27 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (25 June 2026), “Pingquanqi (Equalizer): A Cross-Domain Sociotechnical Framework for Human-Agent Interaction Governance,” evidence record 586, https://ethics.ai/record/586 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.