Polarization and Integration in Global AI Research
The AI race amplifies security risks and international tensions. While the US restricts mobility and knowledge flows, challenges regulatory efforts to protect its advantage, China leads initiatives of global governance. Both strategies depend on cross-country relationships in AI innovation; yet, how this system evolves is unclear. Here, we measure the processes of polarization and integration in the global AI research over three decades by using large-scale data of scientific publications. Compa
Record details
Published: 19 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
PolicyLLM: Towards Excellent Comprehension of Public Policy for Large Language Models
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Understanding the Role of Algorithm Registers in AI Governance Through Comparative Analysis of China and the UK
arXiv · 25 April 2026
Enabling and Inhibitory Pathways of Students' AI Use Concealment Intention in Higher Education: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA
arXiv · 13 April 2026
IndustryBench: Probing the Industrial Knowledge Boundaries of LLMs
arXiv · 11 May 2026
Detection Is Cheap, Routing Is Learned: Why Refusal-Based Alignment Evaluation Fails
arXiv · 18 March 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (19 April 2026), “Polarization and Integration in Global AI Research,” evidence record 5649, https://ethics.ai/record/5649 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.