IndustryBench: Probing the Industrial Knowledge Boundaries of LLMs
In industrial procurement, an LLM answer is useful only if it survives a standards check: recommended material must match operating condition, every parameter must respect a regulated threshold, and no procedure may contradict a safety clause. Partial correctness can mask safety-critical contradictions that aggregate LLM benchmarks rarely capture. We introduce IndustryBench, a 2,049-item benchmark for industrial procurement QA in Chinese, grounded in Chinese national standards (GB/T) and structu
Record details
Published: 11 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Understanding the Role of Algorithm Registers in AI Governance Through Comparative Analysis of China and the UK
arXiv · 25 April 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Polarization and Integration in Global AI Research
arXiv · 19 April 2026
AlignAtt4LLM: Fast AlignAtt for Decoder-Only LLMs at IWSLT 2026 Simultaneous Speech Translation Task
arXiv · 2 June 2026
PolicyLLM: Towards Excellent Comprehension of Public Policy for Large Language Models
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Enabling and Inhibitory Pathways of Students' AI Use Concealment Intention in Higher Education: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA
arXiv · 13 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (11 May 2026), “IndustryBench: Probing the Industrial Knowledge Boundaries of LLMs,” evidence record 4570, https://ethics.ai/record/4570 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.