The Effect of Idea Elaboration on the Automatic Assessment of Idea Originality
Automatic systems are increasingly used to assess the originality of responses in creative tasks. They offer a potential solution to key limitations of human assessment (cost, fatigue, and subjectivity), but there is preliminary evidence of a self-preference bias. Accordingly, automatic systems tend to prefer outcomes that are more closely related to their style, rather than to the human one. In this paper, we investigated how Large Language Models (LLMs) align with human raters in assessing the
Record details
Published: 22 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Rethinking the Comparison Unit in Sequence-Level Reinforcement Learning: An Equal-Length Paired Training Framework from Loss Correction to Sample Construction
arXiv · 19 April 2026
Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment
arXiv · 14 April 2026
From Awareness to Action: Understanding and Overcoming the Research-Practice Gap in Algorithmic Fairness for Public Health
arXiv · 2 May 2026
Aligned Agents, Biased Swarm: Measuring Bias Amplification in Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv · 10 April 2026
Attribution Bias in Large Language Models
arXiv · 6 April 2026
Quality-Conditioned Agreement in Automated Short Answer Scoring: Mid-Range Degradation and the Impact of Task-Specific Adaptation
arXiv · 8 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 April 2026), “The Effect of Idea Elaboration on the Automatic Assessment of Idea Originality,” evidence record 5499, https://ethics.ai/record/5499 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.